Photo of Angela C. Bunnell

Angela C. Bunnell

Angela Bunnell is a member of the Litigation Practice in Greenberg Traurig’s Boston office. Her practice focuses on defending companies against unfair or deceptive business practices claims in individual and putative class action settings. She also represents companies and individuals responding to civil investigative demands under various regulatory schemes, including federal and state false claims acts and related enforcement actions brought by federal and state regulatory agencies. Angela also has experience with complex eDiscovery matters, and has been responsible for preservation, collection, review, and production of ESI in state and federal lawsuits. Angela also has experience in representing clients in connection with data security and privacy matters.

Before joining the firm, Angela served as a federal law clerk, providing valuable insight and understanding of the court system and litigation process.

A Massachusetts Superior Court decision examines the “trade or commerce” requirement under Chapter 93A, highlighting limits in professional services disputes involving non-clients.
Continue Reading ‘Trade or Commerce’ as a Threshold Issue Under Chapter 93A: Lessons for Professional Services Litigation

A Massachusetts court allowed a Chapter 93A claim to proceed where alleged retaliatory termination followed regulatory reporting, highlighting how such claims may survive dismissal.
Continue Reading Massachusetts Federal Court Holds Alleged Retaliation for Regulatory Reporting May Support Chapter 93A Liability

In Crown Communities, LLC v. Austin, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court examined the limits of Chapter 93A in right of first refusal disputes, focusing on good faith misstatements, tenant outreach, and competitive conduct.
Continue Reading Massachusetts High Court Clarifies Limits of Chapter 93A in Right of First Refusal Disputes

A Massachusetts court dismissed Chapter 93A claims in Peptide Tech v. Avidia Bank, holding contractually authorized termination and conclusory allegations insufficient.
Continue Reading Massachusetts Court Rejects Attempt to Recast Breach of Contract as Chapter 93A Claim in Merchant Services Case

In Ortins v. Lincoln Property Company, the Massachusetts high court limited third‑party challenges to class-action settlements and reinforced settlement finality and claims‑made structures.

Continue Reading Massachusetts High Court Emphasizes Judicial Control Over Class Settlements and Limits Nonparty Challenges

In Chew CPG Inc. v. Hiya Health Products, LLC a Massachusetts court allowed a Chapter 93A claim to proceed where alleged misrepresentations and use of proprietary work plausibly exceeded a contract breach.
Continue Reading District of Massachusetts Holds Alleged Post-Termination Use of Proprietary Formulations May Constitute ‘Something More’ Under Chapter 93A