Photo of Angela C. Bunnell

Angela C. Bunnell

Angela Bunnell is a member of the Litigation Practice in Greenberg Traurig’s Boston office. Her practice focuses on defending companies against unfair or deceptive business practices claims in individual and putative class action settings. She also represents companies and individuals responding to civil investigative demands under various regulatory schemes, including federal and state false claims acts and related enforcement actions brought by federal and state regulatory agencies. Angela also has experience with complex eDiscovery matters, and has been responsible for preservation, collection, review, and production of ESI in state and federal lawsuits. Angela also has experience in representing clients in connection with data security and privacy matters.

Before joining the firm, Angela served as a federal law clerk, providing valuable insight and understanding of the court system and litigation process.

In this case, even if Massachusetts had sufficient contacts to support jurisdiction, those contacts did not establish that the alleged unfair acts had their center of gravity in Massachusetts.
Continue Reading Court Rejects Chapter 93A Claim for Lack of Massachusetts Nexus in Kahoot! v. CPDLive

In Crown Communities, LLC v. Austin, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court examined the limits of Chapter 93A in right of first refusal disputes, focusing on good faith misstatements, tenant outreach, and competitive conduct.
Continue Reading Massachusetts High Court Clarifies Limits of Chapter 93A in Right of First Refusal Disputes

The District of Massachusetts granted summary judgment in Amyndas Pharma v. Alexion Pharma, emphasizing that speculative theories and failed negotiations cannot establish Chapter 93A causation.

Continue Reading Massachusetts Federal Court Reinforces Chapter 93A Causation Requirement and Rejects Trade Secret Misuse Theory in Pharmaceutical Case

In Ortins v. Lincoln Property Company, the Massachusetts high court limited third‑party challenges to class-action settlements and reinforced settlement finality and claims‑made structures.

Continue Reading Massachusetts High Court Emphasizes Judicial Control Over Class Settlements and Limits Nonparty Challenges

In Chew CPG Inc. v. Hiya Health Products, LLC a Massachusetts court allowed a Chapter 93A claim to proceed where alleged misrepresentations and use of proprietary work plausibly exceeded a contract breach.
Continue Reading District of Massachusetts Holds Alleged Post-Termination Use of Proprietary Formulations May Constitute ‘Something More’ Under Chapter 93A